Russia responds to U.S. with air base in Belarus
Drawing by Niyaz Karim. Click to enlarge the image.
Russian Defense Minister Gen. Sergei Shoigu's recent visit to Belarus for talks with his counterpart Lt. Gen. Yuri Zhadobin and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko unearthed a sensation. During Shoigu’s visit, it was revealed that Russia intends to establish an air base in Belarus – a country it considers to be its friend and ally.
The establishment of the base had already been agreed upon by Presidents Vladimir Putin and Alexander Lukashenko, but the decision was only announced during Shoigu's trip to Minsk.
According to the Russian minister of defense, the first facility to be built in Belarus will be an aircraft commandant's office (there is no official information regarding which aerodrome), which will be followed by an echelon of Russian fighter planes on combat duty (at least three aircraft) and the deployment of a full air regiment by 2015.
"Thereafter," stated Shoigu, "we expect to address the need to strengthen the defense capability of our Belarusian colleagues and brothers." For that purpose, four divisions of S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems will be delivered to Minsk in 2014.
Why is a Russian air base being set up in Belarus? There are some valid reasons.
First, Moscow and Minsk are both members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and strategic allies on a bilateral footing. For several years now, Belarus and Russia have operated a combined force, which includes some units of Russia's Western Military District (before its formation, units of the Moscow Military District).
There is also a Joint Air Defense Command, which forms part of the CSTO air defense system.
Second, Moscow's ally already hosts two Russian military bases – the "Volga" early-warning radar system in the settlement of Gantsevichy near Baranovichy, and the "Antei" high-frequency radio station, located at Vileika, for communication with ships anywhere in the world at sea. There is also an underground precision-time facility.
Do they need to be supplemented by an air base? That is a question for the presidents and military chiefs. The answer is likely to be found in the actions of NATO, which has placed its own air base in Siauliai, Lithuania.
Located there in a state of permanent combat readiness are four F-16 fighter bombers, which are capable of delivering U.S. B-61 nuclear gravity bombs (currently housed at air bases in the five NATO member-states of Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey) to their designated targets.
For Russia, these bombs (tactical nuclear weapons deployed on fighter bombers) are of strategic relevance, since the flight time from Siauliai to Minsk, Smolensk, or Moscow is about 15 minutes. Is it necessary to protect an ally against such a contingency? Absolutely.
To boot, the U.S. also harbors plans to locate missile defense facilities in Poland, which could neutralize Russia's strategic deterrence. Washington claims it is prepared to meet Moscow halfway and modify its plans, but the Kremlin says that the proposed changes "do not allay our concerns."
In the meantime, the air base in Belarus is likely to act as a kind of shield against any potential unpleasantness that could arise over the ABM system in Poland.
How can NATO's recurrent wars on foreign soil (Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya) over the past 20 years be forgotten? Even now, the alliance is helping the Syrian opposition wage war against the country's legitimate government, with the involvement of al-Qaeda militants.
Throughout all of this, Russia has had to spring to the defense of its peacekeepers and citizens only once – to counter the aggression of the Georgian army in South Ossetia in August 2008. Russia was not the initiator of the conflict either, which was later recognized by the European Commission.
This logic of events is the root cause of the present mutual distrust. Therefore, it is my opinion that Russia will take retaliatory measures.
President Lukashenko stated that September's joint Russian-Belarusian "West-2013" drills would not be directed against "the Poles, the Balts, or NATO in general." Although the Belarusian president’s statement came with a proviso: "But they have to understand that if they try to give us the evil eye, we will respond."
The opinion of the writer may not necessarily reflect the position of RBTH or its staff.