Drawing by Natalia Mikhaylenko
Many
analysts both in Russia and
abroad believe that relations between Russia and the West will
deteriorate under the third presidential term of Vladimir Putin. The day after
Putin was re-elected, one-time Moscow
correspondent Luke Harding, writing in British daily The Guardian, predicted:
“In international relations, it [Russia] will continue to play a
spoiling role, weighing up its own strategic interests against the frisson of
annoying the Americans.” Harding combines these gloomy forecasts with a
comparison of Putin’s rule to that of Leonid Brezhnev.
Left Front leader Sergei Udaltsov,
however, holds the opposite view. “Putin is Russia’s most pro-Western
politician,” Udaltsov said in an interview with Literaturnaya Gazeta. “He shut
down the Soviet military bases in Cuba
and Vietnam, he allowed Nato
to expand to the territory of the former Soviet Union
by admitting the Baltic republics in the early 2000s, and he keeps Russian
budget money in American treasury bonds.”
Much to the chagrin of Russian nationalists, Udaltsov has the facts right. Putin’s
other friendly moves include consenting to the deployment of American bases in
Central Asia in 2001 and cooperation with the Western countries in combating
the Taliban in Afghanistan.
But still there is the abiding sense that Russia’s foreign policy under Putin
will be anti-Western. “It seems as if we have a situation in which the media is
maintaining a myth it has created itself,” wrote Stanislav Belkovsky, a noted
Russian journalist and political scientist, who considers himself a critic of Putin
from what he calls the national-democratic position. “Putin is anything but a
nationalist. Under him, Russia
finally morphed from being a world power into a calm state that has only
regional political ambitions, and even these are not aggressive. But the
Western media have harped on it for so many years that people have
subconsciously come to think of Putin as ‘aggressive.’”
Although outgoing President Dmitry Medvedev has often been considered more
friendly towards the West, much of the credit for his main acheivements — the
“reset” of relations with the United States and the signing of a new Strategic
Arms Reduction treaty (New START) — really belongs to U.S. President Barack
Obama, who led his administration to adopt policies indicating that the U.S.
has stopped perceiving Russia as a threat.
Closer to home, however Putin managed to launch some important foreign policy
initiatives even during his term as prime minister. One was the improvement in
relations with Poland
after 2010, when he visited the memorial to the Polish P.O.W.s who had been
executed at Katyn.
“I am
deeply convinced that the signs of improvement in Russian-Polish relations at
the time were Putin’s personal project,” said Waclaw Radziwinowicz, Moscow correspondent for
Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza. “When Polish President Lech Kaczynski died in
an air crash, it was Putin who began personally eliminating the consequences of
the disaster.”
The tragic plane crash, which occurred
on Russian soil, could have caused further deterioration in Russian-Polish
relations, but instead the countries took the tragedy as an opportunity to make
a fresh start. Putin began this process by visiting the crash site with Polish
officials and then heading up the inquiry into the crash.
In general, this is Putin’s style: coming to the aid of a country that may or
may not have been on good terms with Russia and thereby improving
relations. Another example can be found in Russia’s
response to the disaster at Japan’s
Fukushima
nuclear plant in March 2011. When it became clear that the loss of the nuclear
power station would create a severe shortfall in Japan’s energy supplies, Putin
proposed to compensate with increased deliveries of Russian liquified natural
gas as well as coal.
Although his opinion piece on foreign policy published in the Russian daily
Moskovskie Novosti in the days leading up to the presidential election took a
harsh tone towards Russia’s international partners, the West in particular,
Putin’s actions as prime minister indicate that Russia under Putin, in its
latest incarnation, will not seek conflict, but will rather act strategically
with partners ranging from the European Union and the United States to China
and the Arab world.
“The current political situation is very complicated,” said Tatyana Parkhalina,
an expert from the Moscow-based Center for European Security, “and it is in the
interest of both Russia and
the West to collaborate in fields ranging from the strategic partnership in Afghanistan to
the Iranian nuclear program.”
All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
Subscribe
to our newsletter!
Get the week's best stories straight to your inbox