The system of bachelor/master programs only works on paper in Russia, according to experts. It grants officials a sense of absolute control over the situation. Source: PhotoXPress
Back in September
2003, Russia
joined the Bologna Process aimed at harmonizing European education standards.
Meanwhile, there is no consensus amongst those in Russia’s academia as to whether the
move was justified.
On Sept. 1, hundreds of thousands of students in Russia started their first year (or
returned for yet another year) at a variety of higher educational institutions
across the country. In quantitative terms, this marks a tremendous break from what
we had some 20 years ago, when higher education seemed to have gone out of
fashion forever. In the turbulent 1990s, teenagers fresh out of grade school
wanted to do anything - set up their own private companies, join gangs, stage
revolutions – other than wear out the seat of their pants in universities in
the search for knowledge. These days, the trend is quite the opposite: higher
education is back in vogue, and a degree has become almost a must-have for anyone's life plan. What has
remained unchanged, however, is that only a minimal percentage of school
graduates are actually heading to universities for the knowledge. Most of them
are only pursuing what is called “the sheepskin effect”, or a diploma.
Some Russian universities to close
Should Russian universities pay much attention to rankings?
Naturally, such aspirations were bound to devalue higher education in the eyes of potential employers. Consequently, where a university degree used to be a must for any job candidate, work experience has now become the most important criterion. With higher education institutions popping up across the country like mushrooms after the rain -- producing batches of job candidates with identical resumes -- it is extremely difficult to choose, out of a multitude of almost identical brands, those universities which actually prepare good specialists. Unfortunately, the Russian educational system is such that even a degree from a prestigious school (like the Moscow State University or the Higher School of Economics) does not guarantee a proper educational background. There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which are the widespread practice of cheating among students (which, mercifully, has been waning recently) and the protectionist practices among university administrations (typical of private educational institutions). Russia's transition to the Bologna Process (next year it will be 10 years since Russia signed the declaration) smoothened the situation out to a certain extent, though it clearly did not have the miraculous effect officials had hoped for.
HR analyst Marat Valitov says: “In theory, the Bologna process is designed to help the employer. Supposedly, the employer can now see that this candidate has a bachelor's degree, so he has a basic education, but his qualifications could be better; this candidate has a master's degree, which means that he is trained in a narrow area of specialty, and is hence a far better professional. In reality, though, the situation is quite different. Many higher educational institutions regard master's degree programs merely as a continuation of undergraduate programs, rather than a selection of specific specialties. So, in the end, a bachelor has only one master's program with a very general specialization to choose from, instead of three programs with a narrower focus.”
Simply put, most universities produce a string of so-called “jacks of all trades, but masters of none.” The situation is a fraction better with reputable state-run universities. They generally offer a wider selection of academic majors, where students can choose between a research specialties and specialties in highest demand on the market. Still, this is no more than a drop in the bucket of dreary uniformity produced by other institutions.
By the same token, Russia is in a similar position when it comes to another distinguishing feature of the Bologna process – education abroad. Celebrated universities have long since established international ties. Irina Ipatyeva, a graduate of the Higher School of Economics National Research University, says: “My university runs extensive student exchange programs with Great Britain, Germany, France, and a number of other countries. So when the time came to decide, this choice proved to be the most difficult matter.” Meanwhile, the chances of studying abroad with private universities, which have only existed for 10-15 years at the most, are often no more than fiction. Since the Bologna declaration was signed, no mechanisms have been introduced to ease the integration in Russia.
“The system of bachelor/master programs only works on paper in Russia,” says Aleksandr Malyshev, Doctor of Pedagogy. “It grants officials and inspectors a sense of absolute control over the situation: here's the first degree, and the second, and everything's on record. In reality, the situation is somewhat different: leading universities can make full use of all the features of this system, which gives them a giant competitive edge. But second-tier universities had to rebrand their five-year curricula to match the four-plus-two-year timeline, without actually bringing in anything new. Is there any wonder, then, that employers can often see no fundamental difference between bachelors and masters in professional skills?”
Incidentally, the two-cycle education system has been criticized repeatedly -
for similar reasons - in Europe as well.
President of the German Rectors' Conference Horst Hippler stated that HR
specialists were mistrustful of bachelor's degrees, meaning that it is almost impossible
for graduates to get a head start in their professional careers. Furthermore,
according to Hippler, the project of creating a European Higher Education Area
has also fallen through. “Different
higher education institutions use different criteria, and any transfer from one
institution to another is therefore linked to so many bureaucratic procedures
that they can put people off
studying altogether.”
This is what Germany - a country closely watching the quality of its education - is facing. What can then be expected of the average Russian university, blemished by cheating, petty bribery and an inefficient system of practical training? Clearly, rectors of western universities can hardly be expected to assume that a person with such a degree is any more intelligent than a carrot. That is, Russian students do not have the chance to take advantage of the two-cycle education system, because of the unfavorable reputation (if it has one at all) of their alma maters.
In this light, the education reform actively touted by the Russian Ministry of Education, aimed at dramatically decreasing the number of educational institutions while improving the quality of the surviving ones, seems a fair measure. Indeed, if education does not bring knowledge and opportunities, then what is its purpose?
All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
Subscribe
to our newsletter!
Get the week's best stories straight to your inbox